Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| bruno_zamborlin [2020/04/13 12:04] – mete | bruno_zamborlin [2022/10/19 07:45] (current) – mete |
|---|
| Bruno Zamborlin in a London based Artificial Intelligence researcher who makes Augmented Reality Electronic Instruments. He is known for his Hypersurfaces. | Bruno Zamborlin in a London based artificial intelligence researcher who makes electronic instruments that use contact microphones and augmented reality. He is known for his Hypersurfaces. |
| |
| ===Hypersurfaces=== | ===Hypersurfaces=== |
| |
| ===Notes=== | ===Notes=== |
| TED talk 1 ((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGbyFxw3-pY)) \\ | TED talk on augmented muscial surfaces ((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGbyFxw3-pY)) \\ |
| TED talk on hyper surfaces ((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X9k73HHMyw)) \\ | TED talk on hyper surfaces ((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X9k73HHMyw)) \\ |
| AI & Digital Summit Lecture ((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEooAN7aDwU)) \\ | AI & Digital Summit Lecture ((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEooAN7aDwU)) \\ |
| Kickstarted for his Mogees, an early iteration of the hypersurfaces. ((https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mogees/mogees-play-the-world)) \\ | Kickstarted for his Mogees, an early iteration of the hypersurfaces. ((https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mogees/mogees-play-the-world)) \\ |
| \\ | \\ |
| I percieve a bit of arrogance from the way that Zamborlin presents. He frequently says he gives a voice to various things for example, trees, so that they can communicate when they are being negatively effected by humans, but he also gives no examples of his work being directed at these kinds of forces and he also understates the ways things such as trees are already able to do that. His work in the presentations he makes are very human centrist and he repeatedly gives examples otherwise without showing any work in that direction, which I find suspicious. He also often presents his creations and playful and engaging but understates the alarming undertones of the data use and ai use in them. | \\ |
| | I perceive a bit of arrogance from the way that Zamborlin presents. He frequently says he gives a voice to various things for example, trees, so that they can communicate when they are being negatively effected by humans, but he also gives no examples of his work being directed at these kinds of forces and he also understates the ways things such as trees are already able to do that. With his TED presentation he only shows that a tree can have a contact microphone connected to it, and does nothing to demonstrate anything about the kind of information that interfaces with the tree. His work in the presentations he makes are very commercial centric and he repeatedly gives examples otherwise without showing any work in that direction, which I find suspicious. He also often presents his creations and playful and engaging but understates the alarming undertones of the data use and ai used in them. There also seems to be a shift in his tone from the time he was working with the goal of music to the goal of broad augmented reality. |
